Corruption of Science by our Federal Government

By O. R. Adams Jr.

© O. R. Adams Jr. 2015

BACK TO ARTICLES

Truth is the pillar of civilization. J. Marvin Herndon, Ph.D.

When that pillar crumbles, the knowledge of a civilized society crumbles with it. True science is the means by which we learn about life, nature and the universe. It is the backbone of all learning. When it is corrupted, all learning is corrupted.

Modern liberalism's political correctness has been devastating to science, and the federal government has played a major role in this devastation. The result has turned science into a tool of liberal propaganda. Truth has been replaced by liberal fiction, and our American values are being destroyed – one by one. A great civilization is being turned into a Godless world of make-believe.

When modern liberals find a position on a controversial matter that pleases them, they adopt it as the truth, regardless of whether or not it is supported in fact. They teach it as the truth in our schools, and the liberal media dutifully follow the same line. The government bureaucrats and the scientific journals follow suit. The federal government has played a major part in this fraud upon the people for many years. When the government first entered into the field of science, it seemed that it was for a laudable purpose – to further science – particularly in the important areas needed for the betterment of our country and for our defense needs. But modern liberalism has completely contaminated the bureaucracies in control, and the money and power they control has contaminated and corrupted  all of science.

We need to consider just how all of this was accomplished. I have selected some relevant articles on this written by some highly qualified individuals. I encourage you to read all of the articles selected, because they are comprehensive well supported articles, and contain much more important information than I will cover in order to shorten the length of this paper.

The first article is The Corruption of Science in America,[1] by J. Marvin Herndon, Ph.D. Dr. Herndon earned a B.A. in physics (UCSD), Ph.D. in nuclear chemistry (Texas A&M), and post doctoral apprenticeship in geochemistry and cosmochemistry under Hans E. Suess and Harold C. Urey. Dubbed a "maverick geophysicist" (by The Washington Post), this interdisciplinary scientist is responsible for identifying the composition of Earth's inner core as nickel-silicide and for demonstrating the feasibility of a natural nuclear reactor at Earth's center as the energy source and production mechanism for the geomagnetic field. His professional life has been one of discovering longstanding fundamental scientific mistakes; now he reveals how government action, false dogma, and managerial mistakes that have been crippling and corrupting American science and education for decades. Dr. Herndon states:

Truth is the pillar of civilization. The word 'truth' occurs 224 times in the King James Version of the Holy Bible; witnesses testifying in American courts and before the United States Congress must swear to tell the truth; and, laws and civil codes require truth in advertising and in business practices, to list just a few examples.

 The purpose of science is to discover the true nature of Earth and Universe and to convey that knowledge truthfully to people everywhere. Science gives birth to technology that makes our lives easier and better. Science improves our health and enables us to see our world in ways never before envisioned. It uplifts spirits and engenders optimism. And, science provides a truth-standard, securely anchored in the properties of matter, a means to expose and debunk the charlatans and science-barbarians who would lie, cheat, steal, and tyrannize under the guise of science. …

Prior to World War II there was little government financial support for science. Nevertheless, the 20th century opened and seemed to offer the promise of an unparalleled age of enlightenment and reason. [The article then explains how great progress was made in science by Albert Einstein and others, on their own and with private grants.] …

Although money for science at the time was in short supply, scientists maintained a kind of self-discipline. A graduate student working on a Ph.D. degree was expected to make a new discovery to earn that degree, even if it meant starting over after years of work because someone else made the discovery first. Self-discipline was also part of the scientific publication system. Prior to World War II, when a scientist wanted to publish a paper, the scientist would send it to the editor of a scholarly journal for publication and generally it would be published. A new, unpublished scientist was required to obtain the endorsement of a published scientist before submitting a manuscript. The concept of 'peer review' had not yet been born. …

  But in the final decades of the 20th century, circumstances began to change. On one hand, outwardly, it seemed we were poised for yet another renaissance, with ready access to powerful new computers, satellite imaging, network data systems, and global communications. But, on the other hand, out of sight and unknown to nearly everyone, something had gone seriously wrong. Beneath the surface lay the foundations of a system which had been corrupted and had evolved to support a 'politically correct' consensus-view of Earth and Universe, while tending to discourage, ignore, stifle and suppress advances and challenges by individuals. … [My comment here: A prime example of this is modern day Darwinian Evolution theories.]

This political correctness Dr. Herndon speaks of was the liberal poison that invaded all of science, our schools and universities, and the press. And it corrupted our government.

Herndon explains how the government got control and influenced  science and education. "In 1951, the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) was established to provide support for post-World War II civilian scientific research. The process for administrating the government's science-funding, invented in the early 1950s by NSF, has been adopted, essentially unchanged, by virtually all subsequent U.S. Government science-funding agencies, such as the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the U. S. Department of Energy (DOE)." He explains:

The problem, I discovered, is that the science-funding process that the NSF invented and passed on to other U.S. Government agencies is seriously and fundamentally flawed. As a consequence, for more than half a century, the NSF has been doing what no foreign power or terrorist organization can do: slowly, imperceptibly undermining American scientific capability, driving America toward third-world status in science and in education, corrupting individuals and institutions, rewarding the deceitful and the institutions that they serve, stifling creative science, and infecting the whole scientific community with flawed anti-science practices based upon an unrealistic vision of human behavior. …

As strong as Dr. Hendon's indictment is, even it does not convey the serious damage done to science, America, and the world, in many areas. He explains specific flaws he finds that were major contributors to this situation. He relates how "NSF invented the concept of 'peer review', wherein a scientist's competitors would review and evaluate his/her/their proposal for funding, and the reviewers' identities would be concealed." The danger of these secret reviews, by secret reviewers should have been obvious to anyone. And it was instrumental in turning "science" into a tool of propaganda to promote false "politically correct" concepts of the liberals in control of both the reviews and government grants for "scientific purposes."  The quest of universities and scientists for the government money made available completed the contamination of science, and of education in our schools and universities. This greed for money, and selfishness in protecting its flow to the liberal organizations receiving it took its toll.

"The idea of using anonymous 'peer reviewers' must have seemed like an administrative stroke of genius because the process was adopted by virtually all government science-funding agencies that followed and almost universally by editors of scientific journals." It was then used to blackball and block any scientific research, results, and papers contrary to the liberal view adopted. "And that is not what science is about at all. Not surprisingly, there exists today a widespread perception that to challenge scientific results supported by a U.S. Government agency will lead to loss of one's own support."

Another flaw that became inherent in the government system explained by Herndon was that "NSF invented the concept of scientists proposing specific projects for funding, which has led to the trivialization and bureaucratization of science." With these bureaucratic program managers and secret peer-reviewers "There is no incentive for scientists to make important discoveries or to challenge existing ideas; quite the contrary." A project that might challenge the adopted liberal view on a matter insured no funding for it.

Another flaw in the system explained by Herndon is the widespread practice of make government grants to universities and other non-profit institutions, and giving control of them without accountability. They classify them as "principal investigators." The scientists given that control often "misrepresent with impunity the state of scientific knowledge and engage in anti-competitive practices, including the blacklisting of other capable, experienced scientists." This blacklisting and denying funds and projects is used to ensure that a "politically correct" position adopted in a matter in controversy will not be effectively contradicted. "The result is that American taxpayers' money is wasted on a grand scale and the science produced is greatly inferior to what it might be." And the taxpayers and the public are deceived into believing the opposite of the truth on many scientific subjects.

Still another of the many flaws in the system explained by Herndon is "NSF began the now widespread practice whereby the government pays the publication costs, 'page charges', for scientific articles in journals run by for-profit companies or by special-interest science organizations. Because these publishers demand ownership of copyrights, taxpayers who want to obtain an electronic copy must pay, typically US $40, for an article whose underlying research and publication costs were already paid with taxpayer dollars."

These flaws in the system of the governments funding and failure to properly control and allocate  the funding of science projects were specifically brought to the attention of the of government agencies and the Whitehouse in 2004. But to no avail. I am convinced that the last thing those presently in control want is the replacement of their liberal propaganda disguised as science by true science.

Herndon explained that there was one thing that happened that nevertheless greatly contributed to science was:

In the 1990s, the National Science Foundation funded the development at Los Alamos National Laboratory of an author self-posting archive, where physicists and mathematicians could post their pre-prints, without interference from their competitors, making them available worldwide almost instantly. That archive underwent various name changes, eventually becoming arXiv.org

Since its inception, arXiv.org has become the preeminent means of scientific communication in the areas of science and mathematics it hosts. Rather than wade through the many hundreds of individual scientific journals, often having limited access without paying fees, scientists can receive by email a list of daily postings in specific areas of the scientific disciplines hosted by arXiv.org and can download scientific articles of interest without charge. The development of the author self-posting archive might have become the jewel in NSF's crown, one of its greatest achievements. Instead, NSF's mal-administration permitted it to become an instrument for science-suppression, and for blacklisting and discrimination against competent, well-trained scientists worldwide.

This contribution to freedom of expression and true science was short-lived, because it was completely contrary to the liberal mentality of restricting science to whatever was "politically correct." The National Science Foundation let Cornell University take over arXiv.org. It then became just one more tool of the liberal propaganda system. Herndon relates the results of the new takeover:

The website archivefreedom.org displays case histories of some of the individuals who have been blacklisted by the arXiv.org administration and its 'secret moderators', and includes a statement by blacklisted-scientist and Nobel Laureate Brian D. Josephson explaining the meaning of blacklisting as applied to arXiv.org [3]. Being blacklisted by arXiv.org means that either your attempts to post scientific papers are disallowed, or they are 'buried', i.e., posted in categories where scientists or mathematicians in the specific area will likely not see them, such as in General Physics or in General Mathematics. The principal consequence of arXiv.org blacklisting is to deceive U.S. Government science-funding officials and individuals conducting scientific investigations and teaching science, keeping them in the dark about new ideas and discoveries. Beyond the financial and professional debilitation suffered by blacklisted scientists and mathematicians, there is also a human toll, as one blacklisted individual noted: "Blacklisted scientists are subject to derision, ignorance, insults, lies, false accusations, personal attacks against them, misrepresentations regarding their research, culture, faith, etc."

Hundreds of thousands of scientific papers have been posted on the author self-posting archive, arXiv.org, without any human intervention at all. Human intervention, but not 'peer-review', occurs only when an individual is 'denounced', intentionally singled out for disparate treatment, through the application of unfair, arbitrary, and capricious standards. Being tagged for disparate human intervention may occur for a number of never-specified reasons. Human intervention is perpetrated by arXiv.org administrators in conspiracy with a small group of arXiv.org 'insiders' who may or may not call themselves 'moderators' and who discriminate in secret and without any accountability. Moreover, there is no recourse: in my experience, Cornell University's librarian, provost and president absolve themselves from any oversight responsibility for the conduct of arXiv.org, referring complaints back to the arXiv.org administrators who are the subject of the complaint in the first place. Being 'denounced' for disparate treatment by secret 'insiders', without recourse, is something I might have expected from the now-defunct Soviet Union or from Ceausescu's Romania. But, here it is in America; bought and paid for by the National Science Foundation. As an American citizen, veteran, and taxpayer, I am justifiably appalled!

Contrary to the law under which it was set up, "the U.S. National Science Foundation placed into the hands of one major, well-financed competitor a powerful tool (arXiv.org) which could not only be applied arbitrarily with capricious standards against its competitors, but through such actions would cast a shadow of fear at being 'denounced' in secret and thereupon being blacklisted, further ensuring 'politically correct' consensus conformity and science-suppression."

As to remedying this sordid situation, Herndon recommends a Congressional investigation, and then, if the evidence warrants, putting the (arXiv.org) organization "under aegis of a neutral, non-competitor organization, such as the National Archive or the Library of Congress, as should have been done initially." I would think that the evidence would clearly warrant such action.

Herndon goes on to relate some of his personal experiences, including one research proposal he submitted to NASA, and which was turned down. He explains that he "later independently performed all that [he] had proposed and much more, including demonstrating the feasibility of a nuclear fission reactor at the center of Earth, called the georeactor, as the energy source and production mechanism for the Earth's magnetic field [4, 7-11]. [He] also extended the concept to other planets and large moons [12]. The concept of planetary nuclear fission reactors has received quite thorough vetting in the international scientific community." The NASA response to his work was typical. NASA supported "scientists" did similar work, and made findings that supported what Herndon had done, but never cited his work or papers. He states: "I receive numerous emails from people throughout the world who read NASA news reports and wonder why my work is not mentioned, when it would seem to provide plausible explanations." This kind of thing in the field of science is unforgivable, but there are much worse things going on.

Herndon goes on at length to explain various similar things that have happened, and in which he was personally involved. He also explains how ignoring scientific information and research about the Earth's magnetic field, and its possible reversal or demise, can result in catastrophic results to the people. Some of the information related in this area is quite technical, and I will leave this area to scientists like Herndon. But the general corruption of science concerns us all. And one of his ending thoughts is indisputable:

For the good of all, now is the time to rid science of the charlatans and the science-barbarians, and to create an environment where science can flourish in truth and where scientists can work freely without fear of retribution or denouncement for challenging extant ideas or for failing to adopt the 'politically correct' consensus-approved storyline.

Many place great credence in the concept that true scientific papers should have been subjected to "peer review." From my studies, I have arrived at the opposite opinion. In today's scientific climate, if a scientific paper is on a controversial subject, and has been peer reviewed prior to publication, it indicates that it is politically correct. It may well be pure liberal propaganda. I have more faith in papers that have not been peer reviewed and contain some common sense along with the science. 

The next article I will take up is How the Government Corrupts Science,[2] by Arthur Robinson, Ph.D. Dr. Robinson is a research professor of chemistry and co-founder of the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine. After graduating from the California Institute of Technology in 1963 and earning his Ph.D. from the University of California at San Diego, he served as a UCSD faculty member until co-founding the Linus Pauling Institute of Science and Medicine with Linus Pauling in 1973. Beginning with their initial work together on general anesthesia and the structure of water at Caltech in 1961, Pauling and Robinson carried out published research on a wide variety of topics from nuclear physics to nutrition until 1978. They ceased work together in 1978 because of a disagreement between them on the effects of ascorbic acid on the growth rate of cancer in mice. In 1981, Dr. Robinson, his wife, chemist Laurelee Robinson, physicist Martin Kamen, and later joined by Nobel-winning biochemist R. Bruce Merrifield, cofounded the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine. In recent years, Dr. Robinson has also directed the Petition Project, which has obtained the support and signatures of more than 31,000 American scientists for a petition opposed – entirely on scientific grounds published in peer reviewed journals – to the hypothesis of "human-caused global warming." Dr. Robinson states:

Science is a search for truth among the things that man can see. The Bible teaches that there are things that man can see and those that he cannot see – "faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen" and "we see through a glass darkly." It teaches that "the truth shall make you free" – the truth about both things seen and things not seen.  …

Today, the "truth" seems surrounded by "lies," and those whom we have depended upon to tell the truth appear no longer to be reliable. Worst of all, many of our scientists whom we depend upon to know the truth are … silent.

As the alternative media fill with news of "Climategate" and other scientific scandals, people ask: "What has happened to science? Has it been corrupted as have the Congress, the presidency, the media, and many of our other institutions? Can we no longer depend upon even our scientists to tell the truth?"

In short, the federal government has used some of the earnings of the American people that it demands in taxes to build a giant welfare program for Ph.D.s – now known as "big-time science." As this welfare program has expanded, the conservative culture among American academic scientists has gradually been replaced by an ultraliberal, pro-big-government culture – in just the same way that large government welfare programs have induced this political change in many other national sectors.

As the mainstream media fill our eyes and ears with strange claims about scientific "discoveries" – claims that seem to constantly serve the interests of a government that is clearly bent on enslaving us, why are most of our scientists not heard? Why do they and their institutions remain at best silent and at worst supportive of our enemies? …

Even the true scientists – now a minority among this large population of welfare recipients – must apply for government grants, since the private capital that once funded them has been largely seized by government. [The seizure is by the tax the rich mentality, which takes the money from the wealthy, who once funded foundations that supported true science.]

Unsurprisingly, those in the "business" of "science" have much less use for the honesty, humility and dedicated search for the truth that motivates true scientists. The apparent perversion of science that results is distasteful indeed. The true scientists are still here, but the impostor scientists, in their constant clamor for government funds, political notice and publicity, drown them out – and suppress their voices by means of institutional pressures. …

Even when the goal is a good one, this welfare program for Ph.D.s is markedly inferior. For example, government grants funded billions of dollars of work in academia on the solution of the human genome, yet Dr. Craig Venter led a team of privately funded scientists and beat the academics to the goal – while spending less than 5 percent of the amount of money expended by the academics. His reward? So far, envious tax-funded academics have blocked his well-earned Nobel Prize.

As tax-funded "scientist-nonscientists" have been increasingly used by political, media and business interests to mislead the American people, the human-caused global warming hoax has moved this process to a new, reprehensibly low level. Al Gore was able to foist on the public a movie filled with numerous outright lies about climate science, with almost no response from academic scientists.

The still excellent faculty at Caltech could completely destroy Gore's movie as a minor entertainment during lunch at the campus Athenaeum, but instead they are … silent. Yet, the administration's current secretary of energy, Dr. Steven Chu, was invited to give the Caltech commencement address in 2009, during which he grossly misrepresented climate science and lied outright about the sea level experimental data.

When, however, three Caltech alumni, including one very famous individual, asked to give a seminar at Caltech in response to Chu's claims, their offer was refused. Instead, Caltech asked its alumni to help fund a project wherein students install solar panels on Caltech buildings, using technology so expensive that, even in large industrial installations, it requires 50 years to generate the energy and other costs required to build it – longer than the expected lifetime of the equipment.  …

The dissembling by pseudoscientists to obtain money and notoriety is not restricted to climate issues. In their clamor for money and prestige, we are constantly treated to "scientists" who have, according to their claims, unlocked the secrets of the origin of the universe and the origin of life and have themselves become almost as gods. Their claims are presented as facts – not hypotheses. Scientists who question them are driven from the scientific institutions, and teachers who do not teach their claims to grade-school children as unassailable facts are ousted from their professions. There are even calls from "scientists" to deny scientific educations to those who do not subscribe to their hypotheses about the origin of life. … [Emphasis added.]

Is, however, the custom and culture within the American academic institutions in which they work conducive to the free flow of information between our best scientists and the public? No. These institutions have been co-opted by their dependence on government tax funds. Is, however, the custom and culture within the American academic institutions in which they work conducive to the free flow of information between our best scientists and the public? No. These institutions have been co-opted by their dependence on government tax funds. …

You will notice that Dr. Herndon and Dr. Robinson do not mince words about the "charlatans" and "corruption" we have in science today. It is a sordid situation brought about by modern liberalism, money, and greed. With the help of the liberal media, they control the minds of the general public, and convince them that right is wrong and wrong is right.

Dr. Robinson's paper took up the "man-made global warming" issue. This is the biggest and most expensive hoax and fraud that has ever been foisted on the American public, and on the world. On this, Robinson stated:

When we circulated by mail a petition that rejects the hypothesis of human-caused global warming and urges the United States government to take no action to reduce hydrocarbon use, more than 31,000 Americans with formal university degrees in science, including more than 9,000 Ph.D.s, signed the petition. The signatories included many thousands of scientists in academic institutions. We found, however, that those outside of government-funded academic institutions were four times more likely to sign than those inside such institutions. Those inside academic institutions are under severe pressure not to offend the government.

This petition, which was signed by many of America's most outstanding scientists, states:

We urge the United States government to reject the global warming agreement that was written in Kyoto, Japan in December, 1997, and any other similar proposals. The proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind.

There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth. [Emphasis added.]

In 2010, I wrote the article, The Make-Believe World of Global Warming.[3] It is under articles on this website. This article discloses in detail the fraud and propaganda going on to promote the global warming hoax. It explains how the disclosures of some of this hoax called 'climategate'  began: 

What is generally called "ClimateGate" began when a hacker or whistle-blower obtained emails from Britain's University of  East Anglia's Climate Research Unit (CRU), which is one of the world's leaders in climate research, and a key proponent of global warming propaganda. I call this propaganda, because I consider that term charitable in light of the recent evidence of the deceit and misinformation that has been foisted onto the people of the world. It appears that the deceit and misinformation has involved all of the major players pushing the idea of man made global warming. These include the CRU, U. S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), U. S, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), U. S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (established by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the World Meteorological Organization (WMO)). The global warming propaganda has also been eagerly promoted by the liberal news media.

One thing that is most unfortunate for our country and the world is that our primary agencies that we have looked to for information have become so politicized, and their data is so undependable, that we can no longer depend on them for accurate information as to whether or not we are even in a period of global warming. The evidence also indicates that much of the basic data needed to determine the truth in these matters has been destroyed for the purpose of covering up their fraud.

My paper covered the field of the claimed man-made global warming. It covered the claims of the proponents, and how good provable science largely refutes those claims. It is a long comprehensive article. I think that the greatest fraud is the continual assertion that carbon dioxide (CO2) causes global warming. This continues even now. CO2 is an element necessary for all life on earth. My opinion, after considerable study and research, is that it has little effect on global warming, because it is a gas that contains little substance to reflect heat or light. But if it has any effect, it would be like clouds, which cause global cooling, because the sunlight and heat they reflect, absorb and keep away from the earth in the daytime is more than the heat reflected back to earth, and kept in the lower atmosphere. The amount of heat kept near the Earth's surface, is mainly at night. Some claim that CO2 primarily reflects back heat from the earth, more than it reflects back rays from the sun, because of differences in wavelengths, but I have found no good evidence and research that supports that claim, although I have found plenty of evidence and research to the contrary. There are several more articles on this man-made global warming hoax, on this website, under Articles, and the subheading, Miscellaneous . You may go to them by clicking on them. They are:

A Challenge to Scientists on Whether Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Causes Global Warming

A Short Reminder of How Utterly Ridiculous, Deceitful, and Wrong the "Global Warmers" Have Been

Are Coal, Natural Gas, and Crude Oil Really "Fossil Fuels"? and Is There Any Real Shortage of Oil?

Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Does Not Cause Global Warming -- Update, June 25, 2013

New Evidence That Man-Made Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Does Not Cause Global Warming

Positive Proof That Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Is Not a Driver of Global Warming

Update on Global Warming or Global Cooling

I think that the recent short article, Positive Proof That Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is Not a Driver of Global Warming, is particularly interesting. The National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)  Observatory at Mauna Loa, Hawaii, has kept a long-standing record of both CO2 and temperature at that particular place. It is the accepted basic data source for global increase in CO2. The site proudly displays a chart on the increase in CO2 over the years. But it not only does not show a chart of the temperature over the years – they hide that information. However we are fortunate that someone dug it out and published the following:

http://gailtheactuary.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/1000px-mauna_loa_carbon_dioxide-en-svg.png

Tim Curtin _temp and co2 chart ver 2

We see from the above why the NOAA, one of the staunch "global warmers," hides the temperature. At the same times and place the CO2 increased, the temperature slightly decreased, over a period of almost 50 years. The accepted theory of the global warmers is that CO2 causes global warming by allowing the higher frequency sunlight rays to reach the earth, and reflecting back to earth the lower frequency infrared heat waves, thereby causing the global warming. If this were true, in the same place the CO2 was increasing, the temperature would be increasing to the extent of the effect of the CO2. Certainly, from time to time conditions would cause variances, but these would in time balance out and the temperature trend would be significantly upward. But we see that the facts are the opposite. I consider this irrefutable proof that the increase in man-made CO2 does not significantly increase global temperature. The enormous fraud being perpetrated on us is clear.

President Barack Obama and his administration continually promote the man-made global warming fraud. In January, 2015, in his State of the Union message, he made the misstatement of the year:

No challenge  poses a greater threat to future generations than climate change.[4]

Obama contributed to the rise of the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS) by prematurely withdrawing our troops from Iraq. That is a true threat to this country and not "climate change" which is now the term they use for man-made global warming, because there has been no real global warming for a period of 18 years 7 months.[5] But Obama and his administration see man-made global warming as a greater threat than even ISIS. "In his interview with Vox, President Obama said the media “absolutely” overstates the threat of terrorism in comparison to the threat of climate change."[6] How absurd! For several years now ISIS has been killing American servicemen and beheading Christians and others who do not agree with their radical Islamic religious views. These Islamic radicals killed over 3,000 Americans in one fell swoop in the 9/11 incidents.[7]

There is no record and no real evidence that one person has ever died as a result of any increase in man-made CO2. And from my studies, it is my firm belief that no one ever will. CO2 is vital to the life of all plants and animals. It is beneficial, not harmful.

This corruption of science is not limited to man-made global warming. It extends to every branch of science that is controversial in any way in the modern liberal movement. This includes, but is not limited to, feminism, race relations, intelligence tests that compare men and women or races in any area, homosexuality, transgenderism, and Darwinian Evolution and Intelligent Design in Nature. In some of these areas, the so-called science is almost pure corruption. To cover all of these things in any real detail would require volumes, and will not be attempted in this paper.

However, there are several areas which I think deserve further comment.

One is homosexuality and sodomy. When I use the word sodomy, I mean the filthy, depraved and unnatural sexual acts homosexuals engage in, and by which they obtain their homosexual identity. This applies to both men and women. I have written one book on this, As We Sodomize America - The Homosexual Movement and The Decline of Morality in America, which is under books on this website, and there are thirteen articles on the subject under articles on this website. When a person can be convinced that the vile and filthy acts of sodomy are a good thing, that person can be convinced of anything – regardless of how wrong it is. But that is what has been done in this country, by our government, academia, and the constant hammering of the liberal media.

Our federal courts have joined in the promotion of sodomy. In two clearly unconstitutional decisions, the Supreme Court of the United States made both sodomy and same-sex marriage constitutional rights. Our founders and those who formed and ratified the Bill of Rights and the 13th and 14th Amendments to our Constitution most certainly did not consider engaging in sodomy a constitutional right. When our Constitution and Bill of Rights was formed and ratified, sodomy was a crime in all of the states, and it was so severely condemned that many of the states had the death penalty for the crime of homosexual sodomy. When the 13th and 14th Amendments were ratified in 1865 and 1868, sodomy was a crime throughout the country. These amendments were for the primary purpose of freeing the slaves, and giving black people equal rights. The idea that any intention was to create a right to engage in sodomy or same-sex marriage was unthinkable to the people of that time, and contrary to the clear wording of the amendments. Such rights are pure fictions used by liberal members of the Supreme Court to unlawfully change our Constitution to their own perverted thinking. They should all be impeached for violating their oaths of office to uphold our Constitution.

President Barack Obama and the liberals in our government have put sexual perverts into our military service, and in all of our government agencies. They have continually brainwashed our service men and women, and the people in all of government agencies with propaganda upholding sodomy, and teaching that it is a good and commendable thing for people to engage in. They call it 'Sensitivity Training.' Let me give you a short summary of what these acts of sodomy actually involve from my article, The World's Most Successful Brainwashing – Selling Sodomy:

100% of male homosexuals engaged in oral sex. Approximately 93% engage in anal sex, inserting the penis into the anus of the partner. 92% engage in "rimming", touching the anus of one's partner with one's tongue and inserting the tongue into the anus. 47% engage in "fisting", inserting one's fist into the anus of the partner. 29% engage in "golden showers", urinating on each other. 17% engage in "scat", the eating of feces, or rubbing of feces on each other, and in "mud rolling", rolling on the floor where feces have been deposited. It is not uncommon for a homosexual person to declaw and defang a mouse or other rodent to be inserted into the colon.

The above primarily applies to male homosexuals. However, female homosexuals, lesbians, engage in similar bizarre behavior. To me, some of their acts are downright laughable, with their harnesses and artificial penises, trying to mimic men. But levity is deleted by such darkness and depravity.

Also from the above article:

When the United States became a country, it was a common law crime in all thirteen states, and a crime by statute in most of them. The most renowned scholar on English Law, and particularly the Common Law, was Sir William Blackstone. His Commentaries on the Common Law are still referred to today in our court cases. His explanation on the crime of sodomy is interesting. In a concurring opinion in the United States Supreme Court case of Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 US 186 (1986), upholding a Georgia statute making sodomy a crime, Chief Justice Warren Burger noted:

Condemnation of those practices is firmly rooted in Judeao-Christian moral and ethical standards.  Homosexual sodomy was a capital crime under Roman law. See Cod Theod 9.7.6; Code  Just 9.9.31. See also D. Bailey, Homosexuality and the Western Christian Tradition 70-71 (1975). During the English Reformation when powers of the ecclesiastical courts were transferred to the King's Courts, the first English statue criminalizing sodomy was passed. 25 Hen VIII, ch 6. Blackstone described "the infamous crime against nature" as an offense of "deeper malignity" than rape, a heinous act "the very mention of which is a disgrace to human nature," and "a crime not fit to be named." 4 W. Blackstone, Commentaries *215. The common law of England, including its prohibition of sodomy, became the received law of Georgia and the other Colonies.

The following is from my article on this website, The Depraved Excesses of Homosexual Lifestyles:

As explained above, the bizarre behavior of homosexuals in public places, parades, restrooms, parks, and "bathhouses" is unique to that lifestyle. Any kind of same-sex intercourse is bizarre, because of it is unnatural and perverted. The two most common and well known are oral and anal sex. Many do some even more strange things. They urinate on one another, roll in and eat excrement, and engage in sadomasochism. They put strange things in their rectums such as carrots, cucumbers, light bulbs, and even small animals. [15]

However, it can get even more gross and dangerous than the above. There was a Reuters news article in July, 2005, about a Seattle man who died from having anal sex with a stud horse, resulting in perforation of the man's colon and other internal damage. I believe that such depravity can only come from an extremely sick mind. A later article on the matter may now be found on the internet. This last article explains that the farm where it happened was being used by a bestiality ring. It states: "A cache of hundreds of hours of videotaped man-on-beast sex sessions was found hidden in a field. ... The animals kept at the farm included ponies, horses, goats, sheep and dogs, according to the police commander. Images of the flock of offerings on the bestial dude ranch were relayed over the internet and records indicate men had come from throughout the United States, according to police." [16] This is not only extreme sexual depravity, but it is also heartless cruelty to animals.

As explained  in As We Sodomize America - The Homosexual Movement and The Decline of Morality in America , Chapter 2, both on the American Psychiatric Association and the American Psychological Association were completely corrupted by the homosexual movement, and declared these sick and pathological acts of sodomy to be normal. There are now members of those organizations working to promote pedophilia as normal and acceptable conduct.

The Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts of America have now been corrupted into treating sodomy as acceptable. And this is after hundreds of Boy Scouts were the victims of homosexual rapes and sexual attacks by homosexuals who had lied to get in and became leaders. Thousands of young boys were raped and sexually attacked by homosexual Catholic Priests. These acts of sodomy are all vile, filthy, depraved, and a sin against God and nature. A country that now approves them has completely lost its moral compass. 

The liberals on our United States Supreme Court have continually usurped the rights of the people to change our Constitution.  Only the people and their state representatives have that right. These liberal charlatans invent new constitutional rights to fit their own perverted views. In 1973, in Roe vs. Wade, the United States Supreme Court overturned a Texas and other state laws regulating abortions, inventing a completely new constitutional right for women to have abortions. Such a right was clearly a fiction invented by the liberal members of the court to change our Constitution to reflect their own particular personal views. A few small inroads have since been made to correct that terrible decision, but it should have been overruled in its entirety. Science has entered into the court decisions, with experts trying to tell us when life begins, and that a living breathing child, that can actually feel pain, is not a human being. What corruption!

This terrible law has resulted in the country allowing what is taking place today. The organization, Planned Parenthood, receiving large amounts of taxpayers' money, runs baby slaughter houses called abortion clinics, killing and butchering live breathing babies. Some they kill after the unsuccessful abortion fails to kill them. They butcher the babies for selected body parts, which they sell. Have we no moral fiber left at all?

Another  important area which I think deserves some coverage here is Intelligent Design in Nature, and modern Darwinian evolution theories. Darwinian theories of Evolution are falsely taught in our schools as facts.  I have previously written seven articles on this that may be found under the subheading, Evolution and Intelligent Design, in Articles, on this website. You may go to them by clicking on them. They are:

            Charles Darwin and Alfred Kinsey -- Destroyers of Judeo Christian Morality

            Cone of Evolution

            Evidence of Intelligent Design in Nature

            Intelligent Design Should be Taught in Biology Classes

            The Bases of Mathematics are Intelligently Designed

            The Immoral Religions of Atheism and Evolution

            The Make-Believe World of Darwinian Evolution

Evolution of humans, animals, and plants is a provable fact. What I have not found is any good evidence of one species changing into a completely different species, or a plant changing to an animal or vice versa. I most definitely do not believe in the modern Darwinian theory that life came about by accident in the form of some kind of a one-cell amoeba, and that from that came all plants and animals. The obvious intelligent design in all of nature shows that that theory is not true. Contrary to what the corrupt scientists in this area would have you believe, the vast evidence of intelligent design in nature has nothing whatsoever to do with religion. That argument is falsely used to keep it out of the schools, because it is the death knell of modern Darwinian evolution theories.

For example, we can examine a camera, determine how it works and its purpose, and with that evidence and with a little common sense conclude that it was intelligently designed for the purpose of taking pictures. Unless there was a brand name on the camera, or such identifying things, this does not tell us who designed it, or how many may have took part in the design. An eye is much more complicated and intricate than a camera, and using the same kind of examination, a person would conclude that there was good evidence that the eye was designed for the purpose of seeing. This has been done by some of the world's greatest scientists, including Leonhard Euler, one of the greatest mathematical and scientific geniuses that the world has ever benefited from. Euler said:

… though  we are very far short of perfect knowledge of the subject, the little we do know of it is more than sufficient to convince us of the power and wisdom of the Creator. We discover in the structure of the eye perfections that the most exalted genius could not have imagined.[8]

Euler concluded that the designer was the Creator, which is a natural conclusion, because it is hard to figure out who else it could have been designed by. However the actual evidence does not disclose this, it does not disclose who the designer was or how many there may have been. Recognizing intelligent design in nature and the evidence of it has nothing whatsoever to do with religion. This is merely one more false argument used by the evolutionists to keep the scientific investigation of intelligent design in nature out of the schools.

The reproduction systems of plants and animals are quite obviously designed for the purposes of reproduction and continuation of the species. They are quite varied and numerous, but they all accomplish their purpose. Look at just the reproduction design of humans, the male and female organs, the womb of the female, her mammary glands. One who cannot see that all of these things are designed for and work in harmony to reproduce and care for human beings after they are born has either blinded himself or herself to the facts, or has no common sense at all.

Intelligent design in nature is not limited to plants and animals. It applies to all of nature and our whole universe. It applies to the bases of mathematics, which is why many scientists have called mathematics the language of nature. And it definitely is. Many go further than just recognizing the intelligent design. Euclid, one of the greatest scientists and mathematicians in history, who lived about 325 BC to about 265 BC, and is called the father of geometry, said:

            "The laws of nature are but the mathematical thoughts of God."

Most, if not all, of the great scientists and mathematicians in recorded history recognized the intelligent design in nature. I will name some of the greatest ones of ancient and modern times. Evidence of what they thought and quotes from them are included in my articles, listed above. Some of these great scientists and mathematicians are:

Euclid, Pythagoras, Leibniz, Georg Cantor, Leopold Kronecker, Johannes Kepler, Sir Isaac Newton, Leonhard Euler, Michael Faraday, Louis Pasteur, James Clark Maxwell, Thomas Alvin Edison, Albert Einstein, Gregory Chaitin.

The late and great Albert Einstein, who was far from a religious person,  made the following statement that clearly presents the intelligent design issue:

"You will hardly find one among the profounder sort of scientific minds without a peculiar religious feeling of his own . . . . His religious feeling takes the form of a rapturous amazement at the harmony of natural law, which reveals an intelligence of such superiority that, compared with it, all the systematic thinking and acting of human beings is an utterly insignificant reflection." (Albert Einstein, Ideas and Opinions, New York, 1954, p. 40.)"[9]

The so-called scientists of today that fight the investigation and teaching of the intelligent design in nature in our schools, are lightweights and mental midgets compared to the great scientists who clearly recognized it. They fight it to preserve their positions and grants, and to keep true science from the people.  They successfully use the federal courts and liberal judges to protect their turf.

The scientific community should take a hard look at how it has been corrupted and take the steps necessary to take the politics, personal views, and political correctness out of science. I would think that the best place to start would be to get the government out of science and education. This would not only be a large step toward solving the problem, but it would also save the taxpayers enormous sums of money that is wasted on this corruption. And the people of this country, and their congressional representatives, should take action to correct this sad situation.

In our schools and universities today, students get more of a modern liberal indoctrination than they do an education. It is a disgraceful situation.


[1] http://www.sott.net/article/234225-The-Corruption-of-Science-in-America

[2] http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/papers/commentaries/how_govt_corrupts_sci.pdf

[3] http://www.americantraditions.org/Articles/The%20Make-Believe%20World%20of%20Global%20Warming.htm

[4] http://www.cnsnews.com/blog/terence-p-jeffrey/obama-climate-change-greatest-threat

[5] http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/08/06/a-new-record-pause-length-no-global-warming-for-18-years-7-months-temperature-standstill-extends-to-233-months/

[6] http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/climate-change-greater-threat-terrorism-white-house/story?id=28872778

[7] http://www.history.com/topics/9-11-attacks

[8] The Make-Believe World of Darwinian Evolution, http://www.americantraditions.org/Articles/The%20Make-Believe%20World%20of%20Darwinian%20Evolution.htm

[9] The Make-Believe World of Darwinian Evolution, http://www.americantraditions.org/Articles/The%20Make-Believe%20World%20of%20Darwinian%20Evolution.htm

BACK TO ARTICLES